No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Or do these also include the [[Weekly_Featured_Story]] and/or [[Weekly_Featured_Art]]? I immediately panicked when I read the numbers as Krelle (a guild mate) and I moderate the [[Weekly_Featured_Article]], and I thought we'd made a concerted effort to not overly award guild mates. But I suppose if we leaned towards House Emberfall or the Tears of Draenor that would get grouped into the "Moderators' Guilds", yes? Not disputing the main point but wanted to understand the data you presented. --[[User:Tai Jiang|Tai]] 20:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC) |
Or do these also include the [[Weekly_Featured_Story]] and/or [[Weekly_Featured_Art]]? I immediately panicked when I read the numbers as Krelle (a guild mate) and I moderate the [[Weekly_Featured_Article]], and I thought we'd made a concerted effort to not overly award guild mates. But I suppose if we leaned towards House Emberfall or the Tears of Draenor that would get grouped into the "Moderators' Guilds", yes? Not disputing the main point but wanted to understand the data you presented. --[[User:Tai Jiang|Tai]] 20:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | :Since this image was reposted, I think it's pertinent to ask again for the source of these data. My read of featured articles over the 20 week period that is cited is that there are 2 from my guild (Oleandre and Soubrette, as Velossa was in HE at the time), or 10%, which is (I'm glad to say, based on the most recent graph of contributors of articles) just about right. Where did this higher percentage in the graph come from? --[[User:Tai Jiang|Tai]] 19:20, 24 August 2008 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 19:20, 24 August 2008
Lil,
Just to clarify this, I'm confused about where you're drawing this data from. Are these data from the Weekly_Featured_Article? If so, of the 64 articles on the page, I can identify at most 6 that I'd associate as primarily my own guild members, which is around 10% (possibly still over-represented). The pattern is the same for the 20 week period of awards working backwards from the date you posted here: 2 of 20, 10%.
Or do these also include the Weekly_Featured_Story and/or Weekly_Featured_Art? I immediately panicked when I read the numbers as Krelle (a guild mate) and I moderate the Weekly_Featured_Article, and I thought we'd made a concerted effort to not overly award guild mates. But I suppose if we leaned towards House Emberfall or the Tears of Draenor that would get grouped into the "Moderators' Guilds", yes? Not disputing the main point but wanted to understand the data you presented. --Tai 20:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- Since this image was reposted, I think it's pertinent to ask again for the source of these data. My read of featured articles over the 20 week period that is cited is that there are 2 from my guild (Oleandre and Soubrette, as Velossa was in HE at the time), or 10%, which is (I'm glad to say, based on the most recent graph of contributors of articles) just about right. Where did this higher percentage in the graph come from? --Tai 19:20, 24 August 2008 (UTC)